Saltar para menu de navegação principal Saltar para conteúdo principal Saltar para rodapé do site
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Dossiê temático: Dança e ecologia

Vol. 3 N.º 1 (2025): Revista Estud(i)os de Dança 5

Dance Culture, Ecology, and Wellbeing: Towards an Applied Theory of Dance Anthropology

DOI
https://doi.org/10.53072/RED202501/00202

Resumo

A era do Antropoceno marca uma aceleração da devastação ambiental, impulsionada pelo desenvolvimento urbano-industrial, pela globalização e pela sobrepopulação, afetando a saúde, o bem-estar e a sobrevivência de todas as espécies na Terra. O antropocentrismo, que enfatiza o domínio humano sobre o mundo natural, alimenta esta crise existencial. Conflitos, exclusão e instabilidade, agravados pela crescente incerteza económico-política global, aprofundam os sentimentos de precariedade. Artistas, cientistas e educadores reconhecem que enfrentar estes tempos complexos exige uma mudança de paradigma, orientada para abordagens mais centradas na natureza, capazes de sustentar a complexa e interligada teia da vida. A este desafio respondem bailarinos e bailarinas que compreendem a primazia do movimento como meio de animar as relações entre humanos e não-humanos, com potencial para perturbar o discurso antropocêntrico e transformar positivamente o planeta. Esta afirmação, que inspirou uma investigação interdisciplinar iniciada em 2020, serve de ponto de partida para este artigo, centrado no estudo da cultura da dança a partir de uma perspetiva ecossistémica, que pressupõe uma interação mútua entre as pessoas e o meio ambiente. Conceitos indígenas de relacionalidade, que valorizam a interconexão e a interdependência, oferecem perspetivas críticas sobre ecossistemas sustentáveis, cada vez mais diversos e imprevisíveis. A discussão propõe-se explorar de que forma o movimento — elemento intrínseco à cultura da dança — facilita uma reciprocidade relacional, essencial à adaptação e sobrevivência em contextos dinâmicos. Sistemas de conhecimento cultural da dança que promovem relações ecológicas contribuem para o bem-estar, ao praticar encontros com a diferença e ao desenvolver competências para lidar com a mudança. Esta abordagem aponta para uma teoria aplicada da antropologia da dança — ou do estudo da cultura da dança — que visa restaurar e reabilitar a função do sistema, permitindo-lhe crescer, desenvolver resiliência e prosperar no futuro.

Referências

  1. Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous. Vintage Books.
  2. Adams, M. (2021). Indigenizing the Anthropocene? Specifying and situating multi-species encounters. International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy, 41(3/4), 282-297. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-04-2019-0084
  3. Anschuetz, K. (2014). Toward an archaeology of Pueblo ritual landscapes: A forthcoming NMAC continuing education program. Newsletter of the New Mexico Archaeological Council 1, 9-15. https://nmarchcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/NewsMAC-2014-1.pdf
  4. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
  5. Bardet, M., Clavel, J., & Ginot, I. (2024). Ecosomatics. In R. Barbanti, I. Ginot, M. Solomos, & C. Sorin. (Eds.), Arts, Ecologies, Transitions (pp. 91-94). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003455523
  6. Bianchelli, S., Martini, F., Lo Martire, M., Danovaro, R., & Corinaldesi, C. (2023). Combining passive and active restoration to rehabilitate a historically polluted marine site. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10, Article 1213118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1213118
  7. Boas, F. (1911/1938). The mind of primitive man. The MacMillan Company.
  8. Boehnert, J. (2018). Design, ecology, politics: Towards the Ecocene. Bloomsbury Academic.
  9. Clarke, P. B., & Lewis, T. F. (2023). Wellness-based addictions counseling: Facilitating holistic recovery. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003147954
  10. Crellin, R. J., & Harris, O. J. (2021). What difference does posthumanism make. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 31(3), 469-475. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774321000159
  11. Davis, J. V. (2011). Ecopsychology, transpersonal psychology, and nonduality. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 30(1-2), 137-147. . https://dx.doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2011.30.1-2.137
  12. Deichmann, U. (2017). Hierarchy, determinism, and specificity in theories of development and evolution. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 39(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-017-0160-3
  13. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
  14. Descola, P. (1994). In the society of nature: A native ecology in Amazonia. University of Cambridge Press.
  15. Desjarlais, R., & Throop, C. J. (2011). Phenomenological approaches in anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092010-153345
  16. Drichel, S. (2015). Home - relationality: A symposium. Postcolonial Studies Research Network. https://relationality2015.wordpress.com
  17. Fenton, W. (1951). Introduction: The concept of locality and the program of Iroquois research. In W. N Fenton & J. Gulick (Eds.), Symposium on Local Diversity in Iroquois Culture (pp. 1-12). Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin.
  18. Fenton, W., & Kurath, G. (1953). The Iroquois eagle dance: An offshoot of the Calumet dance. United States Government Printing Office.
  19. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26268226
  20. Fromm, E. (1964). The heart of man, its genius for good and evil. Harper & Row.
  21. Grau, A. (2003). Tiwi dance aesthetics. Yearbook for Traditional Music, 35, 175-80.
  22. Grau, A. (2011). Dancing bodies, spaces/places and the senses: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Dance and Somatic Practices, 3(1-2), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1386/jdsp.3.1-2.5_1
  23. Hamilton, A. (2005). Species diversity or biodiversity? Journal of Environmental Management, 75, 89-92. https://doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.012
  24. Hamilton, C. (2019). The Anthropocene. In B. Fath (Ed.), Encyclopedia of ecology (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 239-246). Elsevier.
  25. Hatton, I. A., Mazzarisi, O., Altieri, A., & Smerlak, M. (2024). Diversity begets stability: Sublinear growth and competitive coexistence across ecosystems. Science, 383(6683), eadg8488. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg8488
  26. Hanna, T. L. (1979). The body of life. Alfred A. Knopf.
  27. Haraway, D. (2008). Where species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
  28. Hayes-Conroy, A., Kinsey, D., & Hayes-Conroy, J. (2022). Biosocial wellbeing: Conceptualizing relational and expansive well-bodies. Wellbeing, Space and Society, 3(100105). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2022.100105
  29. Hodgen, M. 1964. Early anthropology in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  30. Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203466025
  31. Ingold, T. (2006). Rethinking the animate, re-animating thought. Ethnos, 71(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840600603111
  32. Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818336
  33. Jékely, G., Godfrey-Smith, P., & Keijzer, F. (2021). Reafference and the origin of self in early nervous system evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376, 20190764. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0764
  34. Keali’inohomoku, J. (1974). Dance culture as a microcosm of holistic culture. In T. Comstock (Ed.), New dimensions in dance research: The American Indian (pp. 99-106). Committee on Research in Dance.
  35. Keali’inohomoku, J. (1976). Theory and methods for an anthropology of dance [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Indiana University.
  36. Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520276109.001.0001
  37. Küpers, W. M. (2020). From the Anthropocene to an ‘Ecocene’—Eco-phenomenological perspectives on embodied, anthrodecentric transformations towards enlivening practices of organising sustainably. Sustainability, 12, 3633. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12093633
  38. Kurath, G. (1951). Local diversity in Iroquois music and dance. In W. N Fenton & J. Gulick (Eds.), Symposium on Local Diversity in Iroquois Culture (pp. 109-137). Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin.
  39. Kurath, G. (1960). Panorama of dance ethnology. Current Anthropology, 1, 233-254.
  40. Kurath, G. (1966). The kinetic ecology of Yaqui dance instrumentation. Ethnomusicology, 10(1), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/924183
  41. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.
  42. Ludwig, P. E., Reddy, V., & Varacallo, M. (2023). Neuroanatomy, neurons. In National Library of Medicine. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441977/
  43. Lock, M. (2017). Recovering the body. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46(1), 1-14.
  44. Mackean, T., Shakespeare, M., & Fisher, M. (2022). Indigenous and non-Indigenous theories of wellbeing and their suitability for wellbeing policy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11693. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811693
  45. Malone, N., & Ovenden, K. (2016). Natureculture. In A. Fuentes (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Primatology. John Wiley & Sons. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119179313.wbprim0135
  46. Marshall, P. J., Houser, T. M., & Weiss, S. M. (2021). The shared origins of embodiment and development. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 15, 726403. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.726403
  47. Meyer, J. L. (1994). The dance of nature: New concepts in ecology. Chicago-Kent Law Review, Symposium of the Ecology and the Law, 69(4), 875-886. https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol69/iss4/4
  48. Noorani, T., & Brigstocke, J. (2018). More-than-human participatory research. In K. Facer & K. Dunleavy (Eds.), Connected Communities Foundation Series (pp. 10-37). University of Bristol/AHRC Connected Communities Programme.
  49. Oğul, B. (2021). Dance as an ecosystem and within the ecosystem. In Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium of the International Study Group on Music and Dance in Southeastern Europe (pp. 90-95).
  50. Ortiz, A. (1994). The dynamics of cultural survival. In R. J. DeMallie & A. Ortiz (Eds.), North American Indian Anthropology: Essays on Society and Culture (pp. 278-306). University of Oklahoma Press.
  51. Oxford English Dictionary. (n.d.a). Survive. In OxfordEnglishDictionary.com. Retrieved October 8, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/1722426578
  52. Oxford English Dictionary. (n.d.b). Ecosystem. In OxfordEnglishdictionary.com. Retrieved November, 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/1160808329
  53. Randazzo, E., & Richter, H. (2021). Politics of the Anthropocene: Temporality, ecology, and Indigeneity. International Political Sociology, 15(3), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab006
  54. Ross, J. (2007). Anna Halprin: Experience as dance. University of California Press.
  55. Roszak, T. (1995). Where psyche meets Gaia. In T. Roszak, M. E. Gomes, & A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Restoring the Earth, Healing the Mind (pp. 1-17). Sierra Club Books. https://archive.org/details/ecopsychologyres0000unse
  56. Salmón, E. (2000). Kincentric ecology: Indigenous perceptions of the human-nature relationship. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1327-1332. https://doi.org/10.2307/2641288
  57. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2015). Embodiment on trial: A phenomenological investigation. Continental Philosophy Review, 48, 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-014-9315-z
  58. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2019). Kinesthesia: An extended critical overview and a beginning phenomenology of learning. Continental Philosophy Review, 52(2), 143-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-018-09460-7
  59. Shen, B.-W., Pielke Sr., R. A., Zeng, X., Cui, J., Faghih-Naini, S., Paxson, W., & Atlas, R. (2022). Three kinds of butterfly effects within Lorenz models. Encyclopedia, 2(3), 1250-1259. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2030084
  60. Schwanitz, D. (1995). Systems theory according to Niklas Luhmann—its environment and Conceptual Strategies. Cultural Critique, 30, 137-170. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354435
  61. Schwarz, A., & Jax, K. (2011). Etymology and original sources of the term ecology. In A. Schwarz & K. Jax (Eds.), Ecology revisited: Reflecting on concepts, advancing science (pp. 145-147). Springer Science+Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9744-6_9
  62. Simons, G., & Baldwin, D. S. (2021). A critical review of the definition of ‘wellbeing’ for doctors and their patients in a post Covid-19 era. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 67(8), 984-991. https://doi.org/10.1177/002076402110322
  63. Todd, Z. (2015). Indigenizing the Anthropocene. In H. Davis & E. Turpin (Eds.), Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among aesthetics, politics, environment and epistemology (pp. 241–254). Open Humanities Press. https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_560010
  64. Tully, J. (2018). Anthropology, equality/diversity, and world peace. In N. Blackhawk & I. L. Wilner (Eds.), Indigenous visions: Rediscovering the world of Franz Boas (pp. 111-146). Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300196511.003.0006
  65. United Nations. (2021). Climate change ‘biggest threat modern humans have ever faced’, world-renowned naturalist tells Security Council, calls for greater global cooperation (Press Release No. SC/14445). Meeting Coverages and Press Releases. https://www.un.org/press/en/2021/sc14445.doc.htm
  66. Van Assche, K., Verschraegen, G., Valentinov, V., & Gruezmacher, M. (2019). The social, the ecological, and the adaptive: Von Bertalanffy's general systems theory and the adaptive governance of social‐ecological systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 36, 308-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2587
  67. Viveiros de Castro, E. (1998). Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3), 469-488. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034157
  68. Vizenor, G. (2008). Aesthetics of Survivance. In G. Vizenor (Ed.), Survivance: Narratives of Native Presence (pp. 1-7). University of Nebraska Press.
  69. Weaver, L. J. (2022). The laboratory of scientific racism: India and the origins of anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 51, 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-024344
  70. Whyte, K. P. (2017). Indigenous climate change studies: Indigenizing futures, decolonizing the Anthropocene. English Language Notes, 55(1-2), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1215/00138282-55.1-2.153
  71. Wildcat, M., & Voth, D. (2023). Indigenous relationality: Definitions and methods. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 19(2), 475-483. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801231168380
  72. Wolchover, N. (2014). Time’s arrow traced to quantum source. Quanta Magazine. Retrieved September, 12, 2024, from https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-entanglement-drives-the-arrow-of-time-scientists-say-20140416/#