Igor Gasparini holds a degree in Journalism from the Pontifícia Universidade Católica (PUC-SP) and in Physical Education and Health from the Universidade de São Paulo (USP). He holds a postgraduate degree in Cultural Journalism, with an emphasis on Dance Criticism (PUC-SP), a Master's degree in Communication and Semiotics, also from PUC-SP, and is currently pursuing a PhD in Performing Arts from the Institute of Arts at UNICAMP. Director and Performer-Creator of T.F. Cia de Dança, Igor Gasparini received the APCA Award (São Paulo Association of Art Critics) for best dance debut with the piece “ELO” and he was also nominated for the Choreography|Creation award for “RASTRO” (www.tfciadedanca.com.br). He teaches at Technique Dance Courses at the Academia Tania Ferreira and Escola Técnica de Artes (ETEC); he was also a professor of the Bachelor's and Undergraduate Degrees in Performing Arts at the Institute of Arts at the Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP).
The reflections proposed in this article come from the interest in investigating the relationships between creative processes in dance, aesthetic-dramaturgical choices, and the role of the audience in works outside the black box, with their direct relationship to the perception of time in the arts, based on the experiences with T.F. Cia de Dança. One of the hypotheses considers that works outside of the black box, in a Gray Zone, offer the viewer the option to choose and interact with the work, similar to the white cube, but still remaining the characteristics of a scenic work. Multiperspectivism, temporality, the simultaneity of actions, and the relationship with mobile devices are some of the aspects listed by Claire Bishop as defining features of works and artists situated in this gray zone—experiences that were studied and applied in practice through three artistic residencies conducted by the group in São Paulo. According to Claire Bishop (2018), the migration of the performing arts to the museum space brings a series of effects, including the retemporalization of performance, from “event time” to “exhibition time.” This group of actions produces situations that require more visibility for proper discussion, and the intention here is to closely examine works that deviate from the traditional logic of the black box, calling for a different posture from the audience, thereby forging a gray spectator.
References
Bishop, C. (2010). Installation art: A critical history. Tate.
Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso.
Bishop, C. (2018). Black box, white cube, gray zone: Dance exhibitions and audience attention. TDR/The Drama Review, 62(2), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_a_00746
Brannigan, E., & Mathews, H. (2017). Performance, choreography, and the gallery: Materiality, attention, agency, sensation, and instability. Performance Paradigm, 13, 1-6.
Cavrell, H. (2019). Direcionando a expectativa: O risco da expectativa na experiência artística. Anais ABRACE, 20(1), 1-14.
Consejería de Cultura Madrid. (2022, 20 de abril). A escala humana. La Ribot. Una exposición en la Sala Alcalá 31 [Vídeo]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXWXf9iPPBo
Esposito, R. (2004). Bíos: Biopolitica e filosofia. Einaudi.
Lorenzini, M. J. C. (2018). La práctica como investigación: nuevas metodologías para la academia latinoamericana. Revista Poiésis, 14(21-22), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.22409/poiesis.1421-22.71-86
Oliveira, E. D. G. de. (2016). Formas de construir silêncios: Tino Sehgal e as instituições da arte. Anais do XXXVI Colóquio do Comitê Brasileiro de História da Arte: Arte em Ação, 197-206. Campinas, SP. https://www.cbha.art.br/coloquios/2016/anais/2016_anais_cbha.pdf
Rancière, J. (2010). O espectador emancipado. Olho Negro.