Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Thematic focus on Time-Life and Creation

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Revista Estud(i)os de Dança 6

Gray Zone: from the time of the event to the time of visitation and the implications for the gray spectator

DOI
https://doi.org/10.53072/RED202502/00203

Abstract

The reflections proposed in this article come from the interest in investigating the relationships between creative processes in dance, aesthetic-dramaturgical choices, and the role of the audience in works outside the black box, with their direct relationship to the perception of time in the arts, based on the experiences with T.F. Cia de Dança. One of the hypotheses considers that works outside of the black box, in a Gray Zone, offer the viewer the option to choose and interact with the work, similar to the white cube, but still remaining the characteristics of a scenic work. Multiperspectivism, temporality, the simultaneity of actions, and the relationship with mobile devices are some of the aspects listed by Claire Bishop as defining features of works and artists situated in this gray zone—experiences that were studied and applied in practice through three artistic residencies conducted by the group in São Paulo. According to Claire Bishop (2018), the migration of the performing arts to the museum space brings a series of effects, including the retemporalization of performance, from “event time” to “exhibition time.” This group of actions produces situations that require more visibility for proper discussion, and the intention here is to closely examine works that deviate from the traditional logic of the black box, calling for a different posture from the audience, thereby forging a gray spectator.

References

  1. Bishop, C. (2010). Installation art: A critical history. Tate.
  2. Bishop, C. (2011, December 10). Unhappy days in the art world?: De-skilling theater, re-skilling performance. The Brooklyn Rail: Critical Perspectives on Arts, Politics and Culture. https://brooklynrail.org/2011/12/art/unhappy-days-in-the-art-worldde-skilling-theater-re-skilling-performance/
  3. Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso.
  4. Bishop, C. (2018). Black box, white cube, gray zone: Dance exhibitions and audience attention. TDR/The Drama Review, 62(2), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_a_00746
  5. Brannigan, E., & Mathews, H. (2017). Performance, choreography, and the gallery: Materiality, attention, agency, sensation, and instability. Performance Paradigm, 13, 1-6.
  6. Cavrell, H. (2019). Direcionando a expectativa: O risco da expectativa na experiência artística. Anais ABRACE, 20(1), 1-14.
  7. Consejería de Cultura Madrid. (2022, 20 de abril). A escala humana. La Ribot. Una exposición en la Sala Alcalá 31 [Vídeo]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXWXf9iPPBo
  8. Esposito, R. (2004). Bíos: Biopolitica e filosofia. Einaudi.
  9. Esposito, R., Welch, R. N., & Lemm, V. (2012). Terms of the political: Community, immunity, biopolitics. Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823242641.001.0001
  10. Gatti, D. (2010). O corpo através da máscara neutra e os instantes poéticos. Revista Moringa: Artes do espetáculo, 1(2), 69-76. https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/moringa/article/view/7539
  11. Lorenzini, M. J. C. (2018). La práctica como investigación: nuevas metodologías para la academia latinoamericana. Revista Poiésis, 14(21-22), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.22409/poiesis.1421-22.71-86
  12. Midgelow, V. L. (2018). Improvisação em dança como pesquisa: Processos de saber líquidos e devir à linguagem. In A. Teixeira, E. Santos, & R. Hercoles (Orgs.), ANDA: 10 anos de pesquisas em dança (pp. 137–157). Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Dança (ANDA). https://portalanda.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/livro-anda-10-anos_vers%C3%A3o-final-24-setembro-2018-1.pdf
  13. Nelson, R. (2013). Introduction: The what, where, when and why of ‘practice as research’. In R. Nelson (Ed.), Practice as research in the arts: Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistances (pp. 3–22). Palgrave Macmillan. https://raggeduniversity.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/1_x_Robin-Nelson-Practice-as-Research-in-the-Arts_-Principles-Protocols-Pedagogies-Resistances-Palgrave-Macmillan-2013.pdf
  14. Oliveira, E. D. G. de. (2016). Formas de construir silêncios: Tino Sehgal e as instituições da arte. Anais do XXXVI Colóquio do Comitê Brasileiro de História da Arte: Arte em Ação, 197-206. Campinas, SP. https://www.cbha.art.br/coloquios/2016/anais/2016_anais_cbha.pdf
  15. Rancière, J. (2010). O espectador emancipado. Olho Negro.
  16. Seminário Interno Mario Santana. (2020, outubro 7). Topologias do espetáculo: Arte e identidade hoje [Vídeo]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHnvQ0XNVe0
  17. Timberg, S. (2015). Culture crash: The killing of the creative class. Yale University Press.